XTRCOOL

Originally uploaded by leif nordberg

B-b-but he’s LYING!

(Also, I call this the “Vanity Plate Paradox.”)

I mean, a smart person would take his or her direction from the capitalization, or absence thereof. I’m just not sure that’s all of us.

Then I ponder how to work William H. Macy into a killer pun.¹

1. Coming soon, I’m sure.

Leaving all things bagels aside, I want to show you something I just tweeted:

@winni3 At least you have a @gowalla app. I’m still waiting for one that’s supposed to be “coming soon.”

My head almost went all Scanners while typing the “a @gowalla.” Strunk and White, where are you when I need you the most? Is it “a @” or “an @”?

Frankly, I don’t care what it’s supposed to be, both look stupid.

And I will debate this issue in my mind, when I should be working, or sleeping, for weeks.

I’m a mayor.

With a crown.

I’m a mayor of a house – a house of bagels.

And I have a crown.

The poly sci student in me says, “Mayors don’t wear crowns; that’s messed up.”

The egomaniac in me says, “Hell yeah, make that crown HUGE. Make it of BAGELS! Now, my minions, arm the trebuchet with chive cream cheese; we’re invading Panda Express. FOR YOUR MAYYYYYYOR!”

Anyways, I have some thoughts on thoughts on Google Buzz, and I promise there will be no Buzz puns. Promise.

As a lot of folks have touched upon the key features, how-tos, business or enterprise implications, and the like, I’ll try to add a fresh perspective. If you want to know more about Buzz, beyond what I have to say, Google it.

First, let’s talk about the noise in Buzz. There’s a lot of it. For your sake, don’t follow a popular person – every comment, threaded under his/her original post, gives you another unread buzz message and your screen will eventually get flooded.

Also, by default, new comments to your posts show up in your inbox. So, if you’re popular, I recommend a quick change of this setting.

This is all in stark contrast to the simplicity of Twitter. Google may have the pros of a large Gmail user base, or a widely understood UI, but with Buzz it loses the battle over simplicity. Twitter’s linear timeline and the philosophy behind mentions and retweets all act like a natural filter for a lot of noise. You either see a tweet, or you dont, and you move on.

All this makes Google Buzz feel like another email inbox. I don’t want more email.

And now, let’s have an adult conversation. All of us with a web presence need to openly discuss the whole opt-in vs opt-out thing. It’s becoming an issue, so gather ’round.

Originally, Facebook’s privacy controls were quite strict by default; you had to opt-in to sharing your information with people. And, well, they definitely effed it up from a PR standpoint when they moved towards an opt-out procedure. Why’d they even make the change? The average user just uses whatever the default controls are. This means a more open exchange of information on Facebook. More searching, more interacting, all lead to more (see: some) revenue for the social giant.

And Google, you messed up pretty bad too. Now that Buzz is out, you show at least a partial list of people’s contacts by default (in the Google profiles, if you’re looking to turn if off). I’m fine with Google doing all this. But they do it by default.

Solution? Either:

A) We become more savvy web users and learn when and where to opt-out of the services we don’t want. See: “unlikely,” “near impossible,” and “why they are making this stuff opt-out in the first place.”

Or

B) We flip our lids until these social purveyors protect the oblivious by defaulting privacy settings to a less vulnerable state. Hey Schmidt, privacy does exist. After all, you seem to want yours.

Well, folks, that’s pretty much all I have to say. I’m done. No fancy conclusion.

Move on.

Nothing to see here.

This shouldn’t be news to you, but Twitter is great just the same. Except this is a meta look at the topics people are discussing, not really the questions they’re looking to answer.

To the right is a snippet of today’s top ten trending topics.

God, do we have our priorities in order or what?

Expletive.

Ya know, to be clever and such. I guess.

But there were too many terms (see: women Tiger has cheated on his wife with) for Google – the king of the friggin’ Web world – to query simultaneously.

Dang, Tiger. Dang.

Three minutes after download I had my own opinion of Chrome/Chromium OS. Essentially, it’s a validation of everything else written.

It’s a web browser. Your browser experience is the computer experience. Apps are web apps and they open in tabs. Going fullscreen or opening some native apps (like Contacts) give you a type of Fluid App feel. Which is to say, the feel that you’re in a web browser and your navigation tools have just disappeared.

Don’t get me wrong, it’s pretty interesting. Or, rather, the potential is interesting. This is obviously not something you’ll ditch Windows or OS X for, or something you’ll ever want to dual boot nor run as a virtual machine unless you need it as a testing ground. In short, I think John Gruber had it right: meet your new bicycle.

I’d be very interested in trying a polished version on a compatible netbook. You see, a virtual machine has the nasty habit of being sluggish as hell and the big benefit of Chrome OS is supposed to be speed. I should also remind you that the public builds are brand spanking new and that it’ll take some time for Chrome OS to compete with the speed of a Karmic Koala (as benchmarks have shown).

So, uh, there you have it. It’s a geek-out Thursday. Enjoy.

Note: There is a distinction between Chrome and Chromium that I’ll let other people make. Just know that there’s a Chrome and Chromium (both browsers) and a Chrome OS and Chromium OS (both operating systems).

And here I had thought that Jack Daniels had cornered the market when it came to making your kids pass the fuck out. That corner just got a little bit more crowded.

I’ve got the theory down.

But praxis is no fun.